[ { "@graph" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA", "@type" : [ "http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#Nanopublication" ], "http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA/assertion" } ], "http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA/provenance" } ], "http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasPublicationInfo" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA/pubinfo" } ] } ], "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA/Head" }, { "@graph" : [ { "@id" : "http://eurovoc.europa.eu/3949", "@type" : [ "http://schema.org/DefinedTerm" ], "http://schema.org/description" : [ { "@value" : "" } ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "Applied sciences" } ] }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/", "@type" : [ "http://purl.org/wf4ever/ro#ResearchObject", "http://purl.org/wf4ever/roevo#LiveRO", "http://schema.org/Dataset", "http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#DataResearchObject", "https://w3id.org/ro/terms/earth-science#DataResearchObject" ], "http://schema.org/about" : [ { "@id" : "http://eurovoc.europa.eu/3949" } ], "http://schema.org/author" : [ { "@id" : "mailto:anne.line.stensjoen@rohub.com" }, { "@id" : "mailto:erik.magnus.berntsen@rohub.com" }, { "@id" : "mailto:even.fyllingen@rohub.com" }, { "@id" : "mailto:ingerid.reinertsen@rohub.com" }, { "@id" : "mailto:ole.solheim@rohub.com" } ], "http://schema.org/contentSize" : [ { "@type" : "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer", "@value" : "11257" } ], "http://schema.org/contentUrl" : [ { "@value" : "https://api.rohub.org/api/ros/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/crate/download/" } ], "http://schema.org/creator" : [ { "@id" : "mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com" } ], "http://schema.org/dateCreated" : [ { "@value" : "2022-03-22 00:57:43.228000+00:00" } ], "http://schema.org/dateModified" : [ { "@value" : "2025-03-05 00:59:13.596088+00:00" } ], "http://schema.org/datePublished" : [ { "@value" : "2022-03-22 00:57:43.228000+00:00" } ], "http://schema.org/description" : [ { "@value" : "To facilitate a more widespread use of volumetric tumor segmentation in clinical studies, there is an urgent need for reliable, user-friendly segmentation software. The aim of this study was therefore to compare three different software packages for semi-automatic brain tumor segmentation of glioblastoma; namely BrainVoyagerTM QX, ITK-Snap and 3D Slicer, and to make data available for future reference. Pre-operative, contrast enhanced T1-weighted 1.5 or 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans were obtained in 20 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for glioblastoma. MRI scans were segmented twice in each software package by two investigators. Intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software agreement was compared by using differences of means with 95 % limits of agreement (LoA), Dice’s similarity coefficients (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). Time expenditure of segmentations was measured using a stopwatch. Eighteen tumors were included in the analyses. Inter-rater agreement was highest for BrainVoyager with difference of means of 0.19 mL and 95 % LoA from -2.42 mL to 2.81 mL. Between-software agreement and 95 % LoA were very similar for the different software packages. Intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software DSC were ≥ 0.93 in all analyses. Time expenditure was approximately 41 min per segmentation in BrainVoyager, and 18 min per segmentation in both 3D Slicer and ITK-Snap. Our main findings were that there is a high agreement within and between the software packages in terms of small intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software differences of means and high Dice’s similarity coefficients. Time expenditure was highest for BrainVoyager, but all software packages were relatively time-consuming, which may limit usability in an everyday clinical setting." } ], "http://schema.org/encodingFormat" : [ { "@value" : "application/ld+json" } ], "http://schema.org/hasPart" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/0ff0d6cf-f1ef-4640-9db8-d57f3a6ffadd" }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/186c279f-9ada-4c70-8546-7cec7fd4a85e" }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/75c82b1c-24f0-4938-a4aa-6ce514b3df83" }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/df472bdf-7848-4553-a634-2a2c7296e5ad" } ], "http://schema.org/identifier" : [ { "@value" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773" } ], "http://schema.org/license" : [ { "@id" : "https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/" } ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "Glioblastoma Segmentation: Comparison of Three Different Software Packages" } ], "http://w3id.org/ro-id/rohub/model#creation_mode" : [ { "@value" : "MANUAL" } ], "http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#Concept" : [ { "@value" : "agreement" }, { "@value" : "coefficient" }, { "@value" : "comparison" }, { "@value" : "concord" }, { "@value" : "consumption" }, { "@value" : "diversity" }, { "@value" : "glioblastoma" }, { "@value" : "magnetic resonance imaging" }, { "@value" : "partition" }, { "@value" : "rater" }, { "@value" : "software" } ], "http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#FieldOfResearch" : [ { "@value" : "earth sciences" } ], "http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#IPTC" : [ { "@value" : "Computing and information technology" }, { "@value" : "IT-computer sciences" }, { "@value" : "Medical procedure-test" }, { "@value" : "Software" } ], "http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#Lemma" : [ { "@value" : "Intra-" }, { "@value" : "expenditure" }, { "@value" : "glioblastoma" }, { "@value" : "magnetic resonance imaging" }, { "@value" : "rater" }, { "@value" : "segmentation" }, { "@value" : "software" } ], "http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#NASA" : [ { "@value" : "mathematical and computer sciences" } ], "http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#Phrase" : [ { "@value" : "Hausdorff distance" }, { "@value" : "differences of means" }, { "@value" : "glioblastoma segmentation" }, { "@value" : "software packages in terms" }, { "@value" : "time expenditure" } ], "http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#Sentence" : [ { "@value" : "Between-software agreement and 95 % LoA were very similar for the different software packages." }, { "@value" : "Our main findings were that there is a high agreement within and between the software packages in terms of small intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software differences of means and high Dice?s similarity coefficients." }, { "@value" : "To facilitate a more widespread use of volumetric tumor segmentation in clinical studies, there is an urgent need for reliable, user-friendly segmentation software." } ], "http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#TimeReference" : [ { "@value" : "18 min" }, { "@value" : "approximately 41 min" } ], "https://w3id.org/contentdesc#Domain" : [ { "@value" : "medicine" }, { "@value" : "oncology" }, { "@value" : "software" } ], "https://www.w3.org/ns/iana/link-relations/relation#cite-as" : [ { "@value" : "Even Fyllingen, Anne Line Stensjøen, Erik Magnus Berntsen, Ole Solheim, and Ingerid Reinertsen. \"Glioblastoma Segmentation: Comparison of Three Different Software Packages.\" ROHub. Mar 22 ,2022. https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773." } ] }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/#enrichment_service-account-enrichment", "@type" : [ "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent" ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "service-account-enrichment" } ] }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/0ff0d6cf-f1ef-4640-9db8-d57f3a6ffadd", "@type" : [ "http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Folder", "http://schema.org/Dataset" ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "metadata" } ] }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/186c279f-9ada-4c70-8546-7cec7fd4a85e", "@type" : [ "http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Folder", "http://schema.org/Dataset" ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "raw data" } ] }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/75c82b1c-24f0-4938-a4aa-6ce514b3df83", "@type" : [ "http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Folder", "http://schema.org/Dataset" ], "http://schema.org/hasPart" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/resources/b1dd0cba-10c4-4433-a1aa-b06ace1dff57" } ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "data" } ] }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/df472bdf-7848-4553-a634-2a2c7296e5ad", "@type" : [ "http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Folder", "http://schema.org/Dataset" ], "http://schema.org/hasPart" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/resources/da6271ed-312a-41d1-a631-45247953d840" } ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "biblio" } ] }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/resources/b1dd0cba-10c4-4433-a1aa-b06ace1dff57", "@type" : [ "http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Dataset", "http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Resource", "http://schema.org/MediaObject" ], "http://purl.org/dc/terms/bibliographicCitation" : [ { "@value" : "Fyllingen, E., Stensjøen, A. L., Berntsen, E. M., Solheim, O., Reinertsen, I. (2016).Glioblastoma Segmentation: Comparison of Three Different Software Packages [Data set]. Norstore. https://doi.org/10.11582/2016.00004" } ], "http://purl.org/dc/terms/rightsHolder" : [ { "@value" : "USIGT (USIGT)" } ], "http://purl.org/dc/terms/type" : [ { "@value" : "Image" } ], "http://schema.org/author" : [ { "@id" : "mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com" } ], "http://schema.org/contentUrl" : [ { "@value" : "https://archive.sigma2.no/pages/public/datasetDetail.jsf?id=10.11582/2016.00004" } ], "http://schema.org/creator" : [ { "@id" : "mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com" } ], "http://schema.org/dateCreated" : [ { "@value" : "2016-10-11 00:00:00" } ], "http://schema.org/dateModified" : [ { "@value" : "2022-03-22 00:58:14.814982+00:00" } ], "http://schema.org/description" : [ { "@value" : "To facilitate a more widespread use of volumetric tumor segmentation in clinical studies, there is an urgent need for reliable, user-friendly segmentation software. The aim of this study was therefore to compare three different software packages for semi-automatic brain tumor segmentation of glioblastoma; namely BrainVoyagerTM QX, ITK-Snap and 3D Slicer, and to make data available for future reference. Pre-operative, contrast enhanced T1-weighted 1.5 or 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans were obtained in 20 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for glioblastoma. MRI scans were segmented twice in each software package by two investigators. Intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software agreement was compared by using differences of means with 95 % limits of agreement (LoA), Dice’s similarity coefficients (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). Time expenditure of segmentations was measured using a stopwatch. Eighteen tumors were included in the analyses. Inter-rater agreement was highest for BrainVoyager with difference of means of 0.19 mL and 95 % LoA from -2.42 mL to 2.81 mL. Between-software agreement and 95 % LoA were very similar for the different software packages. Intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software DSC were ≥ 0.93 in all analyses. Time expenditure was approximately 41 min per segmentation in BrainVoyager, and 18 min per segmentation in both 3D Slicer and ITK-Snap. Our main findings were that there is a high agreement within and between the software packages in terms of small intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software differences of means and high Dice’s similarity coefficients. Time expenditure was highest for BrainVoyager, but all software packages were relatively time-consuming, which may limit usability in an everyday clinical setting." } ], "http://schema.org/license" : [ { "@id" : "https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/" } ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "Glioblastoma Segmentation: Comparison of Three Different Software Packages" } ], "http://schema.org/sdDatePublished" : [ { "@value" : "2016-10-11 00:00:00" } ], "https://schema.org/maintainer" : [ { "@value" : "Ingerid Reinertsen" } ] }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/resources/da6271ed-312a-41d1-a631-45247953d840", "@type" : [ "http://purl.org/dc/terms/BibliographicResource", "http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Resource", "http://schema.org/MediaObject" ], "http://schema.org/author" : [ { "@id" : "mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com" } ], "http://schema.org/contentUrl" : [ { "@value" : "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0164891" } ], "http://schema.org/creator" : [ { "@id" : "mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com" } ], "http://schema.org/dateCreated" : [ { "@value" : "2022-03-22 00:58:11.962454+00:00" } ], "http://schema.org/dateModified" : [ { "@value" : "2022-03-22 00:58:12.066982+00:00" } ], "http://schema.org/license" : [ { "@id" : "https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/" } ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0164891" } ], "http://schema.org/sdDatePublished" : [ { "@value" : "2022-03-22 00:58:11.962454+00:00" } ] }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/ro-crate-metadata.json", "@type" : [ "http://schema.org/CreativeWork" ], "http://purl.org/dc/terms/conformsTo" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1" } ], "http://schema.org/about" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/" } ] }, { "@id" : "mailto:anne.line.stensjoen@rohub.com", "@type" : [ "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent" ], "http://schema.org/email" : [ { "@value" : "anne.line.stensjoen@rohub.com" } ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "Anne Line Stensjøen" } ] }, { "@id" : "mailto:erik.magnus.berntsen@rohub.com", "@type" : [ "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent" ], "http://schema.org/email" : [ { "@value" : "erik.magnus.berntsen@rohub.com" } ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "Erik Magnus Berntsen" } ] }, { "@id" : "mailto:even.fyllingen@rohub.com", "@type" : [ "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent" ], "http://schema.org/email" : [ { "@value" : "even.fyllingen@rohub.com" } ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "Even Fyllingen" } ] }, { "@id" : "mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com", "@type" : [ "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent" ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "Geo H." } ] }, { "@id" : "mailto:ingerid.reinertsen@rohub.com", "@type" : [ "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent" ], "http://schema.org/email" : [ { "@value" : "ingerid.reinertsen@rohub.com" } ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "Ingerid Reinertsen" } ] }, { "@id" : "mailto:ole.solheim@rohub.com", "@type" : [ "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent" ], "http://schema.org/email" : [ { "@value" : "ole.solheim@rohub.com" } ], "http://schema.org/name" : [ { "@value" : "Ole Solheim" } ] } ], "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA/assertion" }, { "@graph" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA/assertion", "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasDerivedFrom" : [ { "@id" : "https://api.rohub.org/api/ros/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/crate/download/ro-crate-metadata.json" } ] } ], "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA/provenance" }, { "@graph" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA", "@type" : [ "http://purl.org/nanopub/x/RoCrateNanopub" ], "http://purl.org/dc/terms/created" : [ { "@type" : "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime", "@value" : "2026-03-03T16:17:28.369+01:00" } ], "http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/kpxl/gen/terms/RoCrateBot" } ], "http://purl.org/nanopub/x/introduces" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/" } ], "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label" : [ { "@value" : "Glioblastoma Segmentation: Comparison of Three Different Software Packages" } ] }, { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA/sig", "http://purl.org/nanopub/x/hasAlgorithm" : [ { "@value" : "RSA" } ], "http://purl.org/nanopub/x/hasPublicKey" : [ { "@value" : "MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAxszSDYX5tuCSkP7UiCtftYPFNQVTjgNu0I5fwdML2DLRDlp0xzmsQXRk8oHuvwGvG1aMjj6cpUqO+0rz2Sg/wvHOgUpkRH8VJXvmlkhafMLCMtUtk5JIx7e+fkzCby+fnmD7kMkGLrT+OaExWwEDmNlCAt0TPKcHSdwsjso2isXjtAsGevyCMke8ufnFYpjs746JES1eNzVnHnn2Kp/lqcm60GM+J8dLgRZp7fX0anW098xhKym6+xXFzqeju0vYRIHBPerv+r7skWxwk+a7Sd8msqVeYEv6NTqnyWvyWb6Yh8cvj04N6qm/T6C5FUPLQhzSaQgMVMU6yLqjPuu9DwIDAQAB" } ], "http://purl.org/nanopub/x/hasSignature" : [ { "@value" : "q7RMdYpszsXP1srWfYHtONvh3umOjj0uGpAnKOmUcuwK1IRy2R3dSBpllQ1wMxKm0LrRhAS7exAlqkfumeArtOHxtTY8Jgt4RhBJsZ/LhMlHpBdUqq7QhvqUYNpbnfxcS3a1Uc4Ug0F0JLCyEFfnpfTNtp33kLR0QvfReIp4eQp9CUOVLAIjsNVYuHpzY701IGcFIYXtrvsnRu6wppeslzxCgsPibtDzxLgsvSd/iT1c2WTjtpMG6/8qpn9munQz679eiip+QnIWsWBpWinJe2zUV7pPCaHbuclC5I5e77fCJ46jeXn7oVxpHauq21gm3k7JbvbbEIAZLN1XO+sPug==" } ], "http://purl.org/nanopub/x/hasSignatureTarget" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA" } ], "http://purl.org/nanopub/x/signedBy" : [ { "@id" : "https://w3id.org/kpxl/gen/terms/RoCrateBot" } ] } ], "@id" : "https://w3id.org/np/RAKjsADk3pGF-P8KWuvehnshzBmsUQ46TWS8x7gMvfvIA/pubinfo" } ]